Human-Crafted Informatics Literature Review

I am preparing the literature review for my PhD in Informatics and need a collaborator who will read the papers, think with me, and write every line by hand—no AI drafting of the actual text. Because I already use the major tools myself, I am looking for the added value of genuine human insight: the ability to trace debates across journals, compare competing models, and help me weave a clear narrative that supports the quantitative methodology I will apply later in the thesis.

Here is how I would like us to work:

• You receive my initial reading list, suggest any missing landmark studies, and justify each addition.
• We meet (chat or video) to map themes, research gaps, and how they relate to my quantitative design.
• You share annotated notes and outlines before writing prose, so I can see your reasoning in real time.
• A short, 300-word sample based on two articles I provide will let me confirm the voice and depth are truly yours.
• Drafts are delivered in an editable document with tracked changes, reference manager file (Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote—your choice), and a Turnitin report for transparency.

The final deliverable is a cohesive literature review chapter (approx. 10,000–12,000 words) with correctly formatted citations, a synthesized thematic structure, and a clearly articulated research gap aligned to my forthcoming quantitative study.

If you are comfortable showcasing your process and can commit to genuine, human-crafted scholarship, I look forward to hearing how you would approach this collaboration.