Senior CRO / Experimentation Expert - Paid A/B Testing Platform Review (Ongoing Panel)
Budget / Salary$250–750
TypeFreelance project
LocationRemote
Posted3 hours ago
Senior CRO / Experimentation expert wanted for a paid review of our A/B testing platform. Ongoing panel, US-based preferred.
Personyze is a website personalization and A/B testing platform, in market for years serving B2B and ecommerce teams. We are expanding the experimentation side of the product and want senior practitioners to evaluate it properly - not a survey, a real evaluation by someone who runs testing programs for a living.
You get a full test account (we provide one, or you register your own) and put the A/B testing module through what you would normally do to evaluate a tool for your own stack: build a test, set up goals and targeting, check how variants are delivered, look at how results and significance are reported, and judge whether you would trust the numbers.
We want your read on: the visual editor and how it handles real DOM; test setup friction; goal and metric definition; audience and segment targeting depth; statistics and reporting; QA and preview; flicker and performance; and how it compares to Optimizely, VWO, AB Tasty, Convert or Statsig.
Deliverables:
1. A hands-on working session, 60-90 minutes, setting up at least one live test end to end.
2. A written review, 800-1500 words, against a rubric we supply. Structured, blunt, specific.
3. A recorded screen walkthrough (Loom or similar, 20-40 min) narrating your first-run experience out loud - where you hesitated, what you expected to find and did not. Unpolished is fine, this is the most valuable part for us.
4. Your ranked top 5 gaps versus the tool you actually use today, with the business impact of each.
5. A 30-minute call with our product team.
This is evaluation, not implementation. We are not asking you to build, write or ship anything. Your job is to tell us where the platform falls short of what a professional in your field needs.
Who this is for: you have personally designed and analyzed a meaningful volume of tests, you have opinions about sequential versus fixed-horizon testing, and you have been burned by a tool that reported a win that was not there.
Terms: 500 USD fixed for round one, approximately 4-6 hours of work. This is an ongoing panel - we ship features regularly and want the same reviewers back every 6-10 weeks at 400-500 USD per round. A 30-minute interview before any award.
Please answer in your proposal:
1. Which experimentation or personalization platforms have you personally worked in, and for how long in each?
2. One specific example of a testing program you ran and the measured outcome.
3. What is the single most common reason an experimentation tool loses your team's trust? One paragraph - this is the question we actually read.
4. A link to something public you have made: a case study, teardown, talk or post.
Personyze is a website personalization and A/B testing platform, in market for years serving B2B and ecommerce teams. We are expanding the experimentation side of the product and want senior practitioners to evaluate it properly - not a survey, a real evaluation by someone who runs testing programs for a living.
You get a full test account (we provide one, or you register your own) and put the A/B testing module through what you would normally do to evaluate a tool for your own stack: build a test, set up goals and targeting, check how variants are delivered, look at how results and significance are reported, and judge whether you would trust the numbers.
We want your read on: the visual editor and how it handles real DOM; test setup friction; goal and metric definition; audience and segment targeting depth; statistics and reporting; QA and preview; flicker and performance; and how it compares to Optimizely, VWO, AB Tasty, Convert or Statsig.
Deliverables:
1. A hands-on working session, 60-90 minutes, setting up at least one live test end to end.
2. A written review, 800-1500 words, against a rubric we supply. Structured, blunt, specific.
3. A recorded screen walkthrough (Loom or similar, 20-40 min) narrating your first-run experience out loud - where you hesitated, what you expected to find and did not. Unpolished is fine, this is the most valuable part for us.
4. Your ranked top 5 gaps versus the tool you actually use today, with the business impact of each.
5. A 30-minute call with our product team.
This is evaluation, not implementation. We are not asking you to build, write or ship anything. Your job is to tell us where the platform falls short of what a professional in your field needs.
Who this is for: you have personally designed and analyzed a meaningful volume of tests, you have opinions about sequential versus fixed-horizon testing, and you have been burned by a tool that reported a win that was not there.
Terms: 500 USD fixed for round one, approximately 4-6 hours of work. This is an ongoing panel - we ship features regularly and want the same reviewers back every 6-10 weeks at 400-500 USD per round. A 30-minute interview before any award.
Please answer in your proposal:
1. Which experimentation or personalization platforms have you personally worked in, and for how long in each?
2. One specific example of a testing program you ran and the measured outcome.
3. What is the single most common reason an experimentation tool loses your team's trust? One paragraph - this is the question we actually read.
4. A link to something public you have made: a case study, teardown, talk or post.
Apply on Freelancer →
Project sourced from Freelancer.com. Applications happen directly on the original platform — we never collect your data.