Australian Aged Care Compliance SME — ACQS 2025, QI Program & SIRS (short engagement)
Budget / SalaryA$30–250
TypeFreelance project
LocationRemote
Posted2 hours ago
About: We are building a tool that helps Australian residential aged care providers assemble and maintain the evidence required under the strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards, with an initial focus on quarterly QI Program reporting and SIRS incident evidence packaging. I need an experienced Australian aged care quality and compliance practitioner to validate the regulatory logic before I build.
Scope (approx. 15–25 hours over 4 weeks):
Review and correct my mapping of ACQS requirements to the evidence a quality assessor would actually accept, flagging where my interpretation is wrong or naive
Walk me through what your team actually did in the six weeks before your last assessment contact, step by step, including hours and who did what
Review 10–15 anonymised or synthetic evidence artefacts and tell me what an assessor would accept, query, or reject
Sanity-check the QI Program quarterly workflow and the SIRS Priority 1 / Priority 2 packaging process
Tell me plainly where this tool would be useless or would create risk for a provider
You must have: direct hands-on Australian residential aged care quality experience — as a quality/compliance manager, clinical governance lead, DON, registered quality assessor, or independent aged care compliance consultant. Post-November-2025 experience under the strengthened Standards is essential.
Not a fit: general healthcare compliance writers, US/UK-only experience, or anyone without direct Australian aged care assessment exposure.
To apply, answer in your proposal:
(1) which provider(s) and what size,
(2) how many assessment contacts you've personally been through and in what role,
(3) one thing about the strengthened Standards that providers most commonly get wrong.
Scope (approx. 15–25 hours over 4 weeks):
Review and correct my mapping of ACQS requirements to the evidence a quality assessor would actually accept, flagging where my interpretation is wrong or naive
Walk me through what your team actually did in the six weeks before your last assessment contact, step by step, including hours and who did what
Review 10–15 anonymised or synthetic evidence artefacts and tell me what an assessor would accept, query, or reject
Sanity-check the QI Program quarterly workflow and the SIRS Priority 1 / Priority 2 packaging process
Tell me plainly where this tool would be useless or would create risk for a provider
You must have: direct hands-on Australian residential aged care quality experience — as a quality/compliance manager, clinical governance lead, DON, registered quality assessor, or independent aged care compliance consultant. Post-November-2025 experience under the strengthened Standards is essential.
Not a fit: general healthcare compliance writers, US/UK-only experience, or anyone without direct Australian aged care assessment exposure.
To apply, answer in your proposal:
(1) which provider(s) and what size,
(2) how many assessment contacts you've personally been through and in what role,
(3) one thing about the strengthened Standards that providers most commonly get wrong.
Apply on Freelancer →
Project sourced from Freelancer.com. Applications happen directly on the original platform — we never collect your data.